STAR WARS NOW!

I wish to thank Drs. Harold Faretto and Jack Dea for invaluable assistance, and basic information on building a precision scalar wave detector. In addition, I am most grateful to Mr. Hal Crawford for his marvelous special drawings and his kind permission to include them. And I owe a very special debt to Mr. John Bedini for his fundamental laboratory and bench work and his willingness to share his results and insights with me.

Also, I wish to express my deepest appreciation to Mr. Josh Reynolds, Essentia Research, and the Association of Distinguished American Scientists for financial support on this project.

Without the invaluable assistance of these persons, this effort would not have been possible.

Tom Bearden
April 23, 1984

Table of Contents

List of Figures

List of Tables

Originally electrical and magnetics experiments and ideas developed primarily in terms of statics, and great difficulty was experienced in combining the two and passing to a more dynamic theoretical representation. With the advent of Maxwell's equations, electricity and magnetism were combined into an elegant electromagnetic theory, and these equations then served as the basis for the development of modern theory. Gradually potentials were relegated to a position of inferior importance, and they even came to be regarded as purely mathematical conveniences by most scientists.

However, with the advent of Aharonov and Bohm's seminal paper [a], it became crystal clear that potentials are in fact real entities, and they can directly affect and control charged particle systems even in a region where all the fields and hence the forces on the particles have vanished. While this, of course, is completely counter to the conclusions of classical mechanics [a, p. 485], it follows inescapably from quantum mechanics. With Chambers's direct experimental proof of the predicted Bohm-Aharonov effects in 1960 [b], this new viewpoint was firmly established for quantum mechanics and quantum electromagnetics in general. Indeed, the Bohm-Aharonov effect even affects gauge theories, requiring the concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields. [c] Thus increasingly it is the potentials that are primary physical entities, and the fields are of secondary, derived importance in modern quantum electrodynamics.

Yet the full weapon implications of the Bohm-Aharonov discovery have not yet penetrated the minds and consciousnesses of Western physicists, electrical engineers, and weapons analysts. Indeed, an extended treatment of such implications has not even been addressed in the literature. This may be somewhat understandable, since it required over 30 years for physicists to realize the primary actuality of the potentials in the first place [d, pp. 15-12]. Nobelist Feynman states it succinctly: "It is interesting that something like this can be around for thirty years but, because of certain prejudices of what is and is not significant, continues to be ignored." [d, p. 15-12.]

Slowly, however, the overwhelming importance of the scalar electromagnetics indicated by Bohm and Aharonov has been noted by this analyst, and work to investigate and apply this rich new region of quantum electrodynamics is now most certainly warranted. Indeed, it is imperative that an effort of the highest priority be mounted immediately, for our very survival is gravely threatened by scalar electromagnetics weapons already in the hands of the Soviet Union. And at this moment we have absolutely no defense whatsoever against them.

We first define scalar electromagnetics as the quantum mechanical effects and influences that can be accomplished by electrical and magnetic scalar potentials, even in the absence of electric and magnetic fields, or — in other words — that can occur even in otherwise zero-E (electric) and zero-B (magnetic) force-field regions. Note that this definition includes as subsets both the ordinary classical EM field approach and the more fundamental approach of quantum electrodynamics. In the latter approach, one replaces the fields E and B in modern theory with the Φ (electrostatic scalar potential) and A (magnetic vector potential), with the view that these potentials create the E and B fields in the first place. The Bohm-Aharonov effect shows that the E and B fields can remain zero, and yet the potentials can still cause physical effects.

Thus scalar electromagnetics encompasses two cases: (1) the normal case, in which the potentials are viewed as first creating the fields E and B, and these force fields in turn produce physical effects on charged particle systems; and (2) the case in which fields E and B are zero, yet potentials still exist and produce physical effects on charged particle systems.

Indeed, we assume total primacy of scalar potentials, after the work of Whittaker [e], holding that all the effects of present electrodynamics can be produced by utilization and interference of two or more scalar potentials.

Note particularly that one may deliberately create the zero-field, pure potential condition by opposing magnetic and or electrical fields so that they sum to zero (Figure 1). That is, the "zero fields" can be resultant vector zeros, where the combining vector components still exist. In this case one creates a deliberate, artificial scalar potential which contains all the energies of the separate infolded [Bohm's term] vector fields used to make the resultant vector zero. All this infolded energy has been transformed to stress of spacetime, or pure potential (Table 1). However, it does not have a randomized substructure as is usual in quantum electrodynamics, but has a determined, known substructure consisting of the constructed infolded E and B field vectors.

Conceptually, a magnetic pole is such a spatiotemporal stress potential — but usually with a randomized substructure — as is an electrical charge.

Now it is fundamental that only the envelope is "observable," and the infolded substructure has become "virtual." But by having a deliberately designed and controlled substructure, one has turned quantum mechanics inside out. One can now control and engineer the probabilities themselves, and even determine which eigenvector state of a propagating Schrödinger wave will be produced in the collapse of the wave function. Indeed, in theory one can control when the wave function collapses, and under what circumstances. Einstein was correct after all; once we discover His more subtle control mechanism, God does not actually play dice with the universe.

I strongly point out that this is a fundamental change to present quantum mechanics itself. In the axioms of quantum mechanics, the basic virtual state background activity of the universe is assumed to be totally statistical. If it can be made deterministic, then one should be able to "engineer" the presently probabilistic quantum interactions as desired. In short, one would have directly implemented David Bohm's "hidden variables" in a controlled, non-statistical manner.

Awesome implications follow from such capability; literally one can directly engineer the present quantum mechanical structure of physical reality itself, since one can engineer, affect, and control the fundamental virtual processes of nature. Simply by making and utilizing artificial potentials with deliberate substructures, one can engineer the virtual particle interactions that produce all the physical forces of nature, bind the nucleus together, and control and CREATE the world of macroscopic changes we think we inhabit.

Note also that, if one rhythmically varies all the individual summation vectors in the substructure by the same factor, one produces pure potential stress waves — scalar waves — without ever creating external electric and magnetic fields. These are pure waves of spacetime, and they are oscillating curvatures of spacetime itself. They are pure waves of compression and rarefaction of the massless charge of spacetime, and are properly represented as longitudinal waves rather than transverse waves. Thus they are nonHertzian in nature. Among other things, they may be used to generate mass and inertial field directly, but that is beyond the scope of this paper.

To illustrate one remarkable though typical implication of this new breakthrough area, we point out that, by changing the potentials while keeping the force-fields zero, one can directly produce energy at a distance as if it were transported through space without losses, even though no energy transmission through space in the normal fashion occurs as such. Indeed, it may even be possible to utilize pure potential waves to "transport" the energy at any velocity — not limited by the speed of light — since in some cases a potential (for example, electrostatic scalar potential) can be regarded as having infinite velocity, simply appearing "everywhere at once." [f]

Electrostatic scalar potential, for example, may be regarded as a sort of "locked-in stress energy" of vacuum, as can any other vacuum potential. Changing the potential in a region or at a point changes the amount of "locked-in" or "infolded" vacuum energy available or stored in that region or at that point. Yet simply changing the potential at that point or in that region need not involve any local expenditure of work there; the work may be expended elsewhere, and the results realized directly at a distant region by a change in that region's potential, according to the Bohm-Aharonov effect. In the remote region, charged particles are imbedded in vacuum potential by their virtual particle charge flux, and in the induced potential gradients the imbedded particles move, producing electrical and magnetic forces and fields and performing work.

This is somewhat analogous to "putting energy in here" and "extracting it out there" without any travel or losses in between — Nikola Tesla's old "wireless transmission of energy at a distance without losses" idea. Note that, quantum mechanically, we may take the view that this is a very special class of macroscopic "energy tunneling" phenomena, as illustrated in Aharonov and Bohm's original paper [a]. Essentially energy is put into the system at the locations where the scalar potentials are produced, and is recovered at the distant interference zone where particle effects are produced (Figure 2).

To pursue this single example and further show its implications, we point out that in theory one may deliberately make a beam containing zero electric and magnetic fields, simply by properly phase-locking together two or more beams of oscillating ordinary E-H electrical energy, all at the same frequency. In the perfect hypothetical case, for example, two single-frequency beams phase-locked together 180 degrees apart would create such a zero-field or scalar-wave beam (Figure 1). In the real world, one would be phase-locking two beams containing narrow bandwidths, and how much zero-field beam is obtained at the center of the bandwidth would depend on the "Q" (sharpness) of each beam. To purify the beam, it could first be transmitted through a grounded Faraday shield, which would remove most of the ordinary E-H field components not properly zeroed. By successive Faraday "stripping" of the beam, a scalar beam as pure as desired can be obtained.

Such a beam is totally undetectable by a normal E-H detector, since it does not produce normal force-field-induced accelerations of particles (such as the free electron gas in an antenna or the conduction electrons in a Faraday shield). Thus this wave is usually nondetectable except by unique detectors specifically designed to detect Φ and A potential in the condition of zero E and H.

This scalar beam also is capable of strong penetration of ocean water, since free ions do not absorb nearly so much of it as for an ordinary E-H field beam. Thus one may speak of megahertz and even gigahertz beams and signals transmitted through the ocean (and through the earth). In fact, an associate of the author appears to have developed a prototype underwater transmission system, including a sensitive scalar wave detector. Even an underwater radar appears quite feasible.

Very briefly we present a method of making a very sensitive scalar wave detector so that direct measurement and quantization can be established.

First, we regard one oscillation (one wavelength) of the scalar potential wave as a longitudinal photon. Note that this photon contains a substructure, which may be deliberately determined (when artificially made) or randomized (when naturally made in the idealized case).

For convenience we represent normal linearized vacuum (spacetime) as a horizontal or longitudinal vector (Figure 4), implying the direction of motion of the wave in the laboratory frame. By horizontal position in our diagram, we imply a linear, uncurved spacetime and a non-rotated frame. We represent the longitudinal scalar wave as a horizontal vector, and the usual Hertzian wave as a vertical or "transverse" vector. We visualize a normal detector as detecting only a vertical or "transverse" vector, as we have illustrated in Figure 4.

A better way is to bend or curve spacetime itself in a small region, so that a longitudinal wave that passes through that region now possesses a vertical component with respect to that region (Figure 6). Thus a normal detector there will detect that vertical component. We conduct the detection current out of the "bent spacetime" region to an outside (normal) detector, and we then have a scalar wave detector.

To illustrate, we show conceptually how this has been successfully done. Figure 7 shows the concept. First, we utilize a magnetic pole to provide the infolded energy (potential) to bend or curve spacetime. To reach good sensitivity, we need a pole strength connected with a magnetic field strength of 40,000 Gauss or higher. We utilize a small superconducting magnet, which can reach field strengths of from 40,000 to 80,000 Gauss.

Then to prevent detection of superfluous "normal" radiation, we shield the entire magnet in a grounded Faraday cage, as shown in the figure. Hertzian waves will be grounded in this shield, while scalar waves will readily penetrate it undiminished. In other words, the Faraday cage serves as a "stripper," to strip away the ordinary waves, leaving only the scalar waves to penetrate inside. An ordinary wire lies at the top of the magnetic pole, in proximity to it. The wire runs out of the Faraday cage through an insulated port to a resonant tuning circuit, which is sharply tunable over the range of frequencies we are interested in. A preamp amplifies the output of the tuner, and in turn feeds the input of an oscilloscope or other detector.

According to the Bohm-Aharonov effect, if two zero-field scalar wave beams are crossed in a distant region, real physical effects exist in that distant interference zone. In short, one may create "transmitting scalar interferometers" (Figure 2) to produce energetic effects at a distance, in a specified region. For a theoretically perfect scalar interferometer, all the energy fed into the remote transmitters is exhibited in the effects experienced in the interference zone, without "traveling through" the space in between.

This can be comprehended by realizing that energy at the transmitter sites is transformed into stress-energy of vacuum (i.e., pure potential), and it is the potential variation that is accomplished, not transmission of energy through space per se.

We stress that locked-in or infolded vacuum energy in a potential and vector energy in transition are two quite different aspects of the same thing, just as energy and mass are two different aspects of one thing. In the interference zone of two intersecting scalar beams, the out-of-phase regions no longer have sum-zeroed substructure components, so E and B fields appear there, created by the now out-of-phase substructure superpositions. If other E and B fields are already there, these new fields superpose with them, either constructively or destructively. If they add, the existing fields are augmented and increased. If they oppose, the existing fields are diminished or negated. Thus the transmitting scalar interferometer can create or extinguish electromagnetic fields at a distance. In other words, it can produce energy in the distant target interference zone — or extract energy from it.

Continuous input of energy at the transmitter sites produces continuous emergence of energy at the remote interference site. A continuous-wave jammer using this mode, for example, will place all its transmitted power in a small volume around the targeted radar at a distance (Figure 8). The drastic increase in lethality of the jammer is obvious; there is no square-law loss, but only a volumetric dilution around the target itself. Indeed, this type of jamming can be applied to disable and destroy electromagnetic circuits of all types, in widely varying equipments such as tanks, aircraft, communications centers, vehicles, command posts, etc. It is also quite lethal against human beings.

If a highly energetic scalar pulse is synchronously transmitted by each of two remote transmitters, then in the distant interference zone where the two pulses intersect, an impulsive emergence of ordinary electromagnetic energy occurs. This can produce an electromagnetic explosion at the distant intersection site, with concomitant electromagnetic pulse being radiated, etc. Even in the hard vacuum of space, such an electrical explosion and EMP are produced, since the electromagnetic energy produced in the interference zone is sufficient to lift Dirac electrons and other Dirac matter from the Dirac sea, producing a plasma very similar to a nuclear explosion, except for the absence of gamma radiation and nuclear residues.

If continuous energy is fed into the transmitters of the scalar interferometer, then continuous energy emerges in the distant interference zone. For very narrow beams and substantial input energy, the distant energy density can be made quite high. Physical destruction of distant targets can be accomplished in this fashion; and the effects can be produced directly inside bunkers, buildings, tanks and armored vehicles, aircraft, nuclear-tipped missiles, ships, etc.

Relativistic effects such as a change in the rate of flow of time, in the inertia of an object, and in the mass of an object can also be obtained, at least in theory. [j] In theory the speed of light in vacuo can also be changed, and there is already experimental evidence of this effect. [k]

Since in the modern view the vacuum is composed of massless charge, it can be regarded as a single giant electrostatic scalar potential and magnetostatic scalar potential combined, with zero E and H fields. If one were developing weaponry based on the new scalar electromagnetics, then one might expect to find an energetics theory dealing with such a vacuum and based on scalar concepts. One might even utilize a type of field theory based on a fundamental particle conceptualized as a "little piece of vacuum medium." Indeed, evidence for just such a theory exists in the Soviet literature [l], and direct evidence of the Soviet view of the importance of such a concept was certainly provided by the Petukov-Toth affair. [m]

A second highly strategic implication of scalar electromagnetics is that a scalar interferometer connection between transmitter sites and a distant interference zone can be viewed somewhat as a sort of "electrical ground wire" or "common potential" connection between the projectors and the interference site. That is, it represents a "zero-field" connection between the distant site and the projector sites, randomized field zeroing that occurs in the natural temperature oscillations at the distant site can be utilized to extract energy from the site to the projectors. That is, one may extract electromagnetic energy from a distance target or region, as well as produce energy at a distance. Again, the energy extracted is not transported through space as normal electromagnetic energy, but as pure scalar potential.

The mechanism for this may easily be seen if one recognizes that, when fields zero by opposition, the vectors comprising the opposition at that point also comprise a special value of scalar potential. Since each single field vector in the opposition has energy, then the energies of the opposing vectors are "locked-in" as spatiotemporal stress of the scalar potential at that opposition point. Thus "ordinary energy" has been converted to "stress of spacetime" (scalar potential). That POTENTIAL, which is simply massless charge, can then directly affect a distant system [a] and can even do it instantaneously. [f]

Thus the scalar potential can be used, by interferometry, to directly produce energy in a distant target or extract energy directly from that target.

Indeed, because of this hitherto unknown effect, the present conservation of energy law is but a special case of a more fundamental stress conservation law. This more fundamental stress conservation law has already been derived by this researcher. [i, pp. 10-11, 43] See Table 1 for a synopsis.

Direct evidence for a decade of massive Soviet testing of such "energy extraction" strategic systems has recently become apparent. [n, p. 8] Since 1974, very large, anomalous mushroom-shaped ice cloud formations have been repeatedly produced over the Soviet Arctic and detected by U.S. weather satellites. These formations arise suddenly and are very much colder than the surrounding air. They appear to be the result of firing a large scalar interferometer in an "energy extraction" mode; in other words, a "cold explosion" occurs at the distant interference site.

Recently a most dramatic example of such a cold explosion occurred near a pre-announced Soviet weapons test zone off Japan. [n] (See Figure 10 and Tables 2, 3, 4). The mushroom cloud reached 60,000 feet altitude in about 2 minutes, and had a diameter of 150 miles. Several Boeing 747s were in the area, and were later checked for radioactivity with negative results.

In fact, the U.S. has detected at least 78 such Soviet tests [n, p. 8] since 1974, with far less than continuous satellite coverage and little more than cursory imagery examination. Two or three times as many such Soviet "cold explosion" tests may actually have occurred. The direct implication for worldwide weather engineering by the Soviet Union is obvious.

By utilizing three-dimensional truncated Fourier expansion techniques with multiple transmitted frequencies, the scalar interferometer beams can be made to interfere in specific geometric patterns, such as giant hemispheric shells of glowing energy, quite useful in a strategic ABM defense of a large area. Such tests of such giant ABM shields have actually been observed by competent witnesses. [o] Typical examples of a variety of tests of weapons using this mode are given in Appendix I.

The Soviets have been engaged in weaponizing scalar electromagnetics for nearly three decades, as evidenced by Khrushchev's eerie 1960 announcement [p] of a fantastic weapon, more terrible and perfect than rockets and missiles (See Table 5). In addition, such weapons may be what Brezhnev was referring to when the Soviet team at the SALT talks in 1975 introduced the strange proposal that we should also consider outlawing the development of new electromagnetic weapons of a most terrible nature — more frightful than the mind of man had ever imagined. (See Table 6).

Scalar electromagnetic weapons are directly applicable to nearly all phases of warfare, both tactical and strategic, and both offensive and defensive. They can be used to accomplish nearly 100% ABM defense of very large areas and they can destroy ICBMs, TBMs, cruise missiles, aircraft, ordnance, tanks, weapons carriers, personnel carriers, submarines, SLBMs, surface ships, communications equipment, fuel supplies, ammunition supplies, nuclear warheads, and personnel with ease and efficiency. They can be made large or small — indeed, one can be made as small as a large pistol, and carried in the hand. The "Buck Rogers" ray pistol is now a reality.

With such weapons vast areas can be completely destroyed or neutralized within minutes, without permanent contamination. These weapons can also be used to accomplish weather and climate control on a worldwide scale, as well as to cause earthquakes, and they have already been employed in both modes by the Soviet Union.

Essentially, in the "produce energy" mode a powerful scalar interferometer can produce a large high pressure area or "hot spot" at a given distant target area. In the "extract energy" mode, a large low pressure area or "cold spot" can be produced at a given distant target area. Each of these spots can be moved by "sweeping" the interferometer beams so as to change the location of the distant interference zone. (That is, one synchronously rotates the interferometer beams so as to gradually change the location of the distant interference zone, which is creating the spot.) By using multiple transmitters and fairly broad beams, an interference grid can be created over an entire continent or substantial portions of it. (Figure 11). In each grid block in the interference zone, energy can be produced or extracted. (Figure 12). Direct evidence for such usage by the Soviets over North America has been presented. [q]

Certain "signatures" of the Soviet weather control interferometry grid system have been observed all over the U.S. (Figures 13, 14, 15, 17, Table 7), and one major signature has been photographed over Huntsville, Alabama by this author. It is stressed that our normal instruments do not usually detect the directly active scalar beams, unless we detect longitudinal waves as shown in Figure 16. A more definitive paper on this overt weather engineering over North America is in preparation.

As can be seen, the new (to the West) scalar electromagnetics is a reality, as evidenced by the Bohm-Aharonov work and its direct experimental proof. The implications for weaponization on a massive strategic and tactical scale are obvious, and unfortunately the Soviet Union has already developed several generations of such weapons. At least one other country has also developed scalar electromagnetics weaponry.

The Soviet scalar electromagnetics weapons development program appears to have been well underway at the time of the beginning of the "microwave radiation" of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, about 1959 or 1960. (Table 8). A good description of the history of this microwave radiation has been given by Brodeur from a normal electromagnetics viewpoint. [r] Note that "twin beams" were utilized in the radiation, at least from time to time, and a variety of systemological difficulties were induced in personnel in the Embassy. As late as 1982, major Soviet representatives continued to announce warnings of the impending use of new Soviet weapons more powerful than nuclear arsenals. (Table 9).

To repeat, evidence of massive Soviet testing of scalar electromagnetics weapons on a global scale abounds in the open literature. The Soviets have been deploying and repeatedly testing these weapons for nearly three decades, without being recognized by the Western intelligence and scientific communities for what they were.

• [a] Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, "Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory," Phys. Rev., Second Series, Vol. 115, No. 3, August 1, 1959, pp. 485-491.
• [b] R. G. Chambers, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 5, ~1960, p. 3.
• [c] Tai Tsun Wu and Chen Ning Yang, "Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields," Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 12, No. 12, 15 December 1975, pp. 3845-3857.
• [d] Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume II, Section 15-5, pp. 15-8 to 15-14.
• [e] E. T. Whittaker, "On an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field Due to Electrons by Means of Two Scalar Potential Functions," Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Vol. 1, 1903, pp. 367-372.
• [f] John David Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley, New York, 1975, p. 223.
• [g] "Scientists Fail to Solve Vela Mystery," Science, Vol. 207, 1 February 1980, pp. 504-506. "Satellite Evidence Shows Possibility of Nuclear Test, DOD Says," Aerospace Daily, October 29, 1979, p. 286. "A Flash of Light," Newsweek, November 5, 1979, pp. 64-65. "Was It a Nuclear Device?", Newsweek, July 21, 1980, p. 19. "Diverging Views," Washington Roundup, Aviation Week & Space Technology, July 21, 1980, p. 15. Philip J. Klass, "Clandestine Nuclear Test Doubted," Aviation Week & Space Technology, August 11, 1980, pp. 67, 69, 71-72. "Debate Continues on the Bomb That Wasn't," Science, Vol. 209, 1 August 1980, pp. 572-573. "Navy Lab Concludes the Vela Saw a Bomb," Science, Vol. 209, 29 August 1980, pp. 996-997.
• [h] T. E. Bearden, "Toward a New Electromagnetics: Part III: Clarifying the Vector Concept," Tesla Book Co., 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA 94030, 1983.
• [i] T. E. Bearden, "Toward a New Electromagnetics: Part IV: Vectors and Mechanisms Clarified," Tesla Book Co., Millbrae, CA, 1983.
• [j] Ingram Bloch & Horace Crater, "Lorentz-invariant potentials and the non-relativistic limit," Am. J. Phys., Vol. 49, No. 1, January 1981, pp. 67-75.
• [k] B. N. Belyaev, "On Random Fluctuations of the Velocity of Light in Vacuum," Azvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Fizika, No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 37-42.
• [l] A. K. Lapkovskii, "Relativistic Kinematic Equations and the Theory of Continuous Media," Soviet Physics Journal, Vol. 21, No. 6, June 1978.
• [m] Martin Ebon, "Moscow, June 11, 1977," in his Psychic Warfare: Threat or Illusion, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY, 1983, pp. 1-11.
• [n] Greg Rippee, "Mushroom cloud sighted off Japan," Los Angeles Daily News, 11 April 1984, pp. 1, 8.
• [o] Gwynne Roberts, "Witness to a Super Weapon?", The Sunday Times, London, England, 17 August 1980.
• [p] Max Frankel, "Khrushchev Says Soviet Will Cut Forces a Third; Sees 'Fantastic' Weapon," New York Times, 15 January 1960, p. 1.
• [q] T. E. Bearden, "Soviet Weather Engineering," presentation on Open Mind Show, Radio Station KABC, Los Angeles, California March 24, 1984. (Audiotape available from Radio Station KABC, 3321 South LaCienega Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90016.) Also T. E. Bearden, "Soviet Weather Engineering Over North America," in preparation. (To be presented at the U.S. Psychotronics Association Annual Symposium, Oglethorpe College, Atlanta, GA in June 1984.)
• [r] Paul Brodeur, The Zapping of America, W. W. Norton & Co., New York, 1977.
• [s] T. E. Bearden, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla Book Co., 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA 94030, 1981.
• [t] T. E. Bearden, videotape, "Tesla's Secret and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," presented in absentia at the First International Unorthodox Energy Symposium, Toronto, Canada, 1981. Available from Tesla Book Co., Millbrae, CA.

Conceptual diagram of the Saryshagan-type facility as understood by Bearden: a large scalar antenna array with Fourier transform sections (12 wavelengths each), reference/phasing/control and computer facility, explosive generator bank (power for pulse modes), and Moray power units (power for continuous modes). Scalar antennas at both ends. This constitutes a Tesla Howitzer — a scalar interferometer — capable of projecting energy effects to distant targets.

Booms off U.S. east coast. Flashes over Atlantic, off southwest coast of Africa, detected by Vela satellites. Many other test incidents. Bearden interprets these as tests using a Tesla Howitzer (Scalar Interferometer) — a two-transmitter system generating interference at a distant point. One slow wave and one fast wave from the same transmitter, intersecting at the distant target. Detected as "nuclear flashes" because the electromagnetic energy produced in the interference zone mimics some aspects of a nuclear burst.

• YUGOSLAVIAN EARTHQUAKE 15 APRIL 1979
• 7.2 ON RICHTER SCALE
• EPICENTER 33 KM DEEP
• MORE THAN 100 AFTERSHOCKS
• AT KAMENARI: ADRIATIC SEA MUSHROOMED UP — LIKE ATOMIC BOMB EXPLOSION
• ADDITIONAL DETAILS NEEDED

28 JULY 1976

• 7.8 ON RICHTER SCALE
• HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS KILLED
• ACCOMPANIED BY LIGHT, ELECTRICAL EFFECTS
  • 3 TO 5 DAYS BEFORE
  • COMMUNICATIONS INTERFERENCE WITHIN 250 KM
  • SKY LIGHTING OBSERVED

Fall 1983. Deep within Soviet Union, toward Saryshagan Missile Test Range. Nick Downie describes the strange lurid glow that flared silently over the Hindu Kush. (The Sunday Times, London, 17 August 1980.) Multiple incidents in September 1979. Note close proximity in time to first "flash" detected by Vela satellites.

Artist's concept (Hal Crawford) of a Tesla/scalar ABM shield — a large hemispheric shell of electromagnetic energy created by the interference of multiple scalar interferometer beams using truncated Fourier expansion. Such hemispherical shields could in principle intercept and destroy incoming ICBMs. Multiple independent witnesses claim to have observed such formations over the Soviet Union.

Lithuania, 10 Sep 1976 — British European Airways Flight #031, between Moscow and London. The crew encountered and photographed an anomalous luminous phenomenon. CIA report released under FOIA. Bearden interprets as evidence of continuous Tesla EMP globe testing — a stationary ball of electromagnetic energy maintained by scalar interferometer beams in "produce energy" mode.

June 18, 1982 · North Pacific · 700 km east of Kushiro — Reported in Asahi Evening News, Tokyo, June 22, 1982. Observed by JAL Flights 403 and 421. Luminous circular formation 18–27 km in diameter observed at sea level. Bearden interprets as continuous Tesla EMP globe and giant ABM shield testing.

Tehran, Iran · 17 June 1966 — Seen from near Mehrabad Airport. Observed 4–5 minutes. Seen by 2 aircraft. CIA report released under FOIA. Bearden classifies as Tesla EMP globe — a ball of EM energy held in place by intersecting scalar beams.

Diagram of the complete Tesla ABM defense system as envisioned by Bearden: detection and tracking feeds targeting data to Tesla Howitzers (USSR), which project scalar beams to create a Continuous Tesla EMP Globe at the target location. This globe vaporizes the incoming vehicle (Continuous Tesla Fireball mode) or produces an EMP pulse to disable its electronics (Tesla Fireball Pulse mode). The Tesla Shield provides the outer ABM envelope.

24 March 1977 · North Atlantic · 0855–0902 GMT · M.V. Kinpurnie Castle · 23°05'N, 17°25'W

• "SEARCHLIGHT" APPEARED 20° ABOVE HORIZON
• SHINED DOWN FOR 10 SECONDS
• EXTINGUISHED; REPLACED BY LUMINOUS PATCH 1° IN DIAMETER
• SEMICIRCLE OF MODERATE LUMINOSITY FORMED ABOUT PATCH (3 MIN)
• ANOTHER LUMINESCENT PATCH OBSERVED ABOVE SEMICIRCLE
• AFTER TOTAL OF 7 MINUTES, DISAPPEARED

Source: Marine Observer, 48:21-22, 1978.

December 1977 — January 1978

• 2 DEC: 10:00 AM off South Carolina; 3:45 PM off NE Coast (NJ and CONN)
• 15 DEC: 8:30–10:30 AM — Five blasts off South Carolina
• 20 DEC: Evening — 3 loud explosions, ball of fire (CONN)
• 21 DEC: 2:00 AM loud explosion and intense globular light in sky (NJ); 7:00 PM explosions over seacoast (NJ)
• 22 DEC: 1 New Jersey; 8:15 Charleston, SC
• 13 JAN: 2:00 PM loud booms, Charleston, SC

16 November 1982

• FIVE MYSTERIOUS MORNING BOOMS: 8:06, 8:07, 8:11, 8:12 and 8:45
• WITHIN 39-MINUTE PERIOD
• ROCKED SUSSEX COUNTY
• RECORDED ON GEORGETOWN SEISMOGRAPHS
• NO SUPERSONIC FLIGHTS

8:15 PM, Thursday, August 1969, Virgin Islands · Seen by many residents

Possible Tesla shield sighting. Luminous arc with smooth, curved edge, faintly luminescent.

22 August 1969 · West Indies (Luminous Arc):

• LUMINOUS AREA SIGHTED · BEARING 310 DEGREES
• GREW IN SIZE, ROSE IN ALTITUDE
• TURNED INTO ARCH OR CRESCENT

Marine Observer 40:107, 1970.

20 March 1969 · Caribbean and Western North Atlantic — Tesla shield sighting.

• SEMICIRCLE · MILKY WHITE LIGHT · QUITE BRIGHT AT FIRST
• DIMMED AS ENLARGED · LASTED 10 MINUTES

Marine Observer 40:17, 1970.

1800 GMT, June 1, 1961 · Indian Ocean — Double concentric Tesla Shields.

• VERY BRIGHT ARC APPEARED
• 10 MINUTES LATER, 2nd (DIMMER) ARC APPEARED
• SEPARATED BY ~150°

Marine Observer 32:64, 1962.

• AT LEAST FOUR INCIDENTS IN LATTER 1975
• TWO USAF SATELLITES IN ELLIPTICAL ORBIT
  • INFRARED SENSORS WENT DOWN
  • ONE BLINDED UP TO FOUR HOURS
  • POSITIONING AND INTERFERENCE SUGGEST OPERATIONAL DEPLOYMENT
• SOVIET TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKTHROUGH ON THE ORDER OF LITHIUM FUSION OR SPUTNIK
• U.S. RECON SATELLITES AND PHOTO INTERPRETERS FAILED TO LOCATE ANY LASER OR POWER SUPPLY

15 May 1972 · Western Alaska

• WEATHER: OVERCAST
• ENTIRE SKY SUDDENLY BRIGHTENED TO FULL DAYLIGHT INTENSITY
• LIKE A SUDDEN FLASHBULB
• LASTED ABOUT 2–7 SECONDS · TWO CLOSELY-SPACED FLASHES NOTED
• CHANGED COLOR: BLUE TO GREEN TO WHITE, FADING TO ORANGE OR REDDISH

Sky and Telescope 44:19, 1972.

Diagram showing radar energy being captured (no reflection) by an "energy bottle" — the interference pattern between Fourier expansion patterns from scalar transmitters. ACQ radar and track radar both have their beams absorbed into the scalar interference zone. This concept — making a target invisible to radar by absorbing its radar emission — constitutes a form of scalar stealth technology.

Scalar resonance phenomenon: unidirectional forces induced on all nucleons. Three scalar transmitters (XLTR #1, #2, #3) directed at a test object on a demonstration platform create an inertial force — effectively an artificial gravitational or anti-gravitational field. This is achieved by engineering the virtual particle interactions in the object's mass via the scalar potential substructure.

1959–1960 · Patrol Plane Commander, U.S. Navy P5 Aircraft · Atlantic Ocean, 200 miles east of Norfolk — Report from private files of T. E. Bearden.

• COURSE OF 270 DEGREES
• APPROACHED "SOLID WALL OF LIGHTNING"
• FROM VERY HIGH ALTITUDE TO NEAR THE WATER
• NORTH-SOUTH AS FAR AS COULD SEE
• RADAR SCOPE CLEAR
• RIGGED AIRCRAFT FOR HEAVY WEATHER
• PLUNGED DIRECTLY THROUGH WALL
• WALL WAS VERY THIN · CLOUDLESS SKY

Underwater, off Cornwall

• SEALS AND FISH DISCOVERED DYING WITH MYSTERIOUS BURN MARKS
• DIVERS AND REPORTERS INVESTIGATED; HEARD SOUNDS UNDER WATER
  • VOICES IN FRENCH, ENGLISH, RUSSIAN
  • CLASSICAL MUSIC (BRAHMS, RACHMANIOFF)
  • UNNERVING BUZZING
  • THICK BLACK SLUDGE — YELLOWISH MATTER
• ENGLISH CHEMICAL WARFARE STATION ON COAST AT THIS POINT

Strait of Gibraltar · 12 July 1980 · 1825 GMT — "A most peculiar cloud arch." Marine Observer 51: 107–108, 1981.

Tesla dome effect. May have been an ice test in endothermic mode. An arc of "clouds" in an otherwise cloudless sky, with sharp pressure and temperature gradients at the edges. Approximately 4 miles total span.

The author concludes with an urgent call for an immediate crash program — analogous in scale and priority to the Manhattan Project — to understand, replicate, and develop defenses against Soviet scalar electromagnetics weapons. The seven elements above represent the minimum required scope of such a program.